Filed under: About GreenMedInfo, Featured Article | Tags: acupuncture, alternative medicine, alternative modalities, complementary medicine, greenmedinfo updates, greenmedinfo.com, massage, natural database, tai chi
Greenmedinfo added a “Therapeutic Actions” page to include all the alternative, non-invasive therapies with therapeutic value as part of the project. What follows is the list of Actions and the number of articles indexed so far.
Filed under: Featured Article
Here is the study straight from Medline:
J Nat Prod. 1996 Feb;59(2):100-8.
Five novel mono-tetrahydrofuran ring acetogenins from the seeds of Annona muricata.
Rieser MJ, Gu ZM, Fang XP, Zeng L, Wood KV, McLaughlin JL.
AgrEvo Research Center, Pikeville, North Carolina 27863, USA.
Bioactivity-directed fractionation of the seeds of Annona muricata L. (Annonaceae) resulted in the isolation of five new compounds: cis-annonacin (1), cis-annonacin-10-one (2), cis-goniothalamicin (3), arianacin (4), and javoricin (5). Three of these (1-3) are among the first cis mono-tetrahydrofuran ring acetogenins to be reported. NMR analyses of published model synthetic compounds, prepared cyclized formal acetals, and prepared Mosher ester derivatives permitted the determinations of absolute stereochemistries. Bioassays of the pure compounds, in the brine shrimp test, for the inhibition of crown gall tumors, and in a panel of human solid tumor cell lines for cytotoxicity, evaluated relative potencies. Compound 1 was selectively cytotoxic to colon adenocarcinoma cells (HT-29) in which it was 10,000 times the potency of adriamycin.
view on greenmed: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/content/graviola-annona-muricata-contains-compounds-cytotoxic-effects-against-tumor-cell-lines-inclu
This was an in vitro study performed well over a decade ago, and what is so interesting about it is the observation that Graviola (Annona muricata) demonstrated cytotoxicity against colon cancer cells 10,000 times more potently than adriamycin.
In order to fully comprehend the significance of this, it is important to understand what adriamycin is.
Adriamycin is the byproduct of exposing a soil microbe known as Streptomyces peucetius to a powerful carcinogen known as N-nitroso-N-methyl urethane, forcing it to produce a red antibiotic substance. This chemotherapeutic agent has earned the nickname “red devil” due to its color and powerful and often deadly side effects. Arguably, many who succumb to cancer treatment with this agent die not from the cancer but from the adverse effects of the “chemotherapeutic” agent. It is possible that if they had done nothing whatsoever, many would live longer and with better quality of life than if they succumbed to treatment with substances like this.
Unlike Adriamycin, Graviola appears to demonstrate selectivity to colon cancer cells, i.e. leaving healthy tissue unharmed. This is the primary difference between the “slash and burn” approach of conventional chemotherapy treatments, and natural substances. Time and time again (as evidenced by hundreds upon hundreds of studies on cancer posted on GreenMedInfo.com) we have found that natural substances selectively target and induce programmed cell death (apoptosis) in unhealthy cells, while leaving the healthy cells unharmed.
This study speaks volumes to the infinite difference between poison based “therapies” versus those provided in whole form from nature, without the primary profit-motive of proprietary formulations. In order for a chemotherapeutic product to have economic viability it must be chemically unique, and therefore biological unprecedented. This is why poisons will always be the only FDA approved drugs allowed to be used in conventional treatments.
If Hippocrates, the founder of modern medicine, were alive today, he would be forced to qualify himself by saying: “Seek FDA approval for permission to let food be thy medicine.
The common kitchen spice Turmeric is a perfect example of this extraordinary hypocrisy. Although one can find over 200 biomedical citations on PubMed (pubmed.gov) discussing Turmeric’s ability to cause apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, it has not received the FDA’s approval as a drug in the treatment of cancer. With over a million cases of cancer diagnosed annually in America, wouldn’t it be sensible for the FDA to approve the use of a substance with such extraordinary scientific backing and consensus on its effectiveness AND safety? And if not as a pimary chemotoxic treatment, than at the very least as an adjunctive therapy? Sadly, the likely reason this miraculous substance has not been made available to cancer sufferers today is because it can be grown in one’s back yard for free!
Here we have the fundamental point. The FDA’s definition of a drug is not descriptive, but is a persuasive definition which purports to describe the “true” or “commonly accepted” meaning of a term, while in reality stipulating a meaning that serves only the interests of the drug companies it so spinelessly serves. If an herb can not be converted into a proprietary, profitable, patentable commodity, it will forever be barred from attaining the legitimacy of a “drug,” no matter how effective it is at treating disease. When drug companies do manage to produce an extract of a whole herb, they almost invariably make the same fatal error: they equate the healing force of the whole plant with only certain decomposed isolates or ‘mono-chemicals’ found within this living, infinitely complex totality. Even worse, they tinker with these isolates to ensure that they are unique enough to derive a patent, with the unfortunate outcome that the new chemical analogue is now biologically unprecedented. This folly results in profound side effects and toxicity, and serves only one objective: to ensure the 20 year market exclusivity that a FDA awarded patent affords. One can play God by isolating and reproducing facsimiles of a component of a complex living organism such as Turmeric.
But the isolate will never compare to the safety and healing power of the whole herb, produced by Mother Nature Herself; rather, it is more likely to behave like Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, with uncontrollable and violent side effects.
And this is another key point: Mother Nature does not grant patents, even though her formulas are proprietary. She will never lend herself to rampant profit making and outlandish claims, nor will she make the mechanism of her healing perfectly intelligible vis-à-vis the scientific method. It is commodity and profit driven medicine, with its underlying emphasis on perverting the scientific method to serve economic objectives that concerns itself with patent exclusivities, hyperbolic claims and profit as an end unto itself. Rather than lament this fact, I have decided to celebrate it. If whole food supplements, herbs and vitamins are forever exiled from the would-be legitimacy of the allopathic pharmacopoeia, then so be it! This can not obviate the healing gifts that issue prolifically and freely from the Lap of Nature herself; nor does it negate that birthright of health which we all participate in, knowingly and unknowingly. Rather, this exclusion of what works and is right, and good, from the compass and concern of orthodox medical principle and practice, is an indication of a complete failure in credibility of the allopathic system as a whole, and which has earned it its disgraceful nickname: the Disestablishment. Until food is allowed to be considered medicine once again, orthodox medical can not rightly claim to be interested in healing disease. Thomas Edison left us with a sage premonition of a possible future that may still remain within our grasp, when he wrote:
“The doctor of the future will give no medicine but will interest his patients in the care of the human frame, in diet, and in the cause and prevention of human disease.”
Filed under: Featured Research | Tags: beyond wheat, celiac disease, WGA, wheat gluten problem, wheat intolerance, wheat is not a health food, wheat lectin, wheat sensitivity
[As published in the 2009 winter edition of the Journal of Gluten Sensitivity]
by Sayer Ji
Now that celiac disease has been allowed official entry into the Pantheon of established medical conditions, and gluten intolerance is no longer entirely a fringe medical concept, the time has come to bring attention to the powerful little chemical in wheat known as ‘wheat germ agglutinin’ (WGA) which is largely responsible for wheat’s pervasive and difficult to diagnose ill effects. Not only does WGA throw a monkey wrench into our assumptions about the primary causes of wheat intolerance, but due to the fact that WGA is found in highest concentrations in “whole wheat,” including its supposedly superior sprouted form, it also pulls the rug out from under one of the health food industry’s favorite poster children.
Beneath the radar of conventional serological testing for antibodies against the various gluten proteins and genetic testing for disease susceptibility, the WGA “lectin problem” remains almost entirely obscured. Lectins, though found in all grains, seeds, legumes, dairy and our beloved nightshades: the tomato and potato, are rarely discussed in connection with health or illness, even when their presence in our diet may greatly reduce both the quality and length of our lives.
Although great progress has been made in the direction of revealing the dark side of wheat over the past decade, gluten receives a disproportionate amount of the attention. Given that modern bread wheat (Triticum Aestivum) is a hexaploid species containing three distinct sets of chromosomes capable of producing well over 23,000 unique proteins, it is not surprising that we are only just now beginning to unravel the complexities of this plant’s many secrets. [1] What is unique about the WGA glycoprotein is that it can do direct damage to the majority of tissues in the human body without requiring a specific set of genetic susceptibilities and/or immune-mediated articulations. This may explain why chronic inflammatory and degenerative conditions are endemic to wheat-consuming populations, even when overt allergies or intolerances to wheat gluten appear exceedingly rare. The future fate of wheat consumption, and by implication our health, may depend largely on whether or not the toxic qualities of WGA come to popular light.
Nature engineers within all species a set of defenses against predation, though not all are as obvious as the thorns of a rose or the horns of a rhinoceros. Plants do not have the cell-mediated immunity of higher life forms, like ants, nor do they have the antibody-based secondary immune systems of jawed vertebrates. They must rely on a much simpler innate immunity. It is for this reason that seeds of the grass family, e.g. rice, wheat, spelt, rye, are designed with exceptionally high levels of defensive glycoproteins known as lectins. Cooking, sprouting, fermentation and digestion are the traditional ways in which man, for instance, deals with the various anti-nutrients found within this family of plants, but lectins are, by design, particularly resistant to degradation through a wide range of pH and temperature.
WGA lectin is an exceptionally tough adversary as it is composed of the same disulfide bonds that make vulcanized rubber and human hair so strong, flexible and durable. Like man-made pesticides, lectins are extremely small, difficult to break down by living systems, and tend to accumulate and become incorporated into tissues where they interfere with normal biological processes. Indeed, WGA lectin is so powerful an insecticide that biotech firms have used recombinant DNA technology to create genetically modified WGA-enhanced plants. We can only hope that these virtually unregulated biotech companies, who are in the business of playing God with the genetic infrastructure of Life, will realize the potential harm to humans genetic modification in which this will result.
Lectins are glycoproteins, and through thousands of years of selectively breeding wheat for bread-making purposes to contain increasingly higher quantities of protein, the concentration of WGA lectin has increased proportionately. This, no doubt, has contributed to wheat’s global dominance as one of the world’s favored monocultures, offering additional “built-in” pest resistance. The word lectin comes from the same etymological root as the word select, and literally means “to choose.” Lectins are designed “to choose” specific carbohydrates that project off the surface of cells and upon which they attach. In the case of WGA the two glycoproteins it selects for, in order of greatest affinity, are N-Acetyl Glucosamine and N-Acetylneuraminic acid (sialic acid).
WGA is Nature’s ingenious solution for protecting the wheat plant from the entire gamut of its natural enemies. Fungi have cell walls composed of a polymer of n-Acetylglucosamine. The cell wall of bacteria is made from a layered structure called the peptidoglycan, a biopolymer of N-Acetylglucosamine. N-acetylglucosamine is the basic unit of the biopolymer chitin, which forms the outer coverings of insects and crustaceans (shrimp, crab, etc). All animals, including worms, fish, birds and humans, use N-Acetyglucosamine as a “ground substance” for building up the various tissues in their bodies, including the bones. The production of cartilage, tendons, and joints depend on the structural integrity of N-Acetylglucosamine. The mucous known as the glycocalyx, or literally, “sugar coat” is secreted in humans by the epithelial cells which line all the mucous membranes, from nasal cavities to the top to the bottom of the alimentary tube, as well as the protective and slippery lining of our blood vessels. The glycocalyx is composed largely of N-Acetylglucosamine and N-Acetylneuraminic acid (also known as sialic acid), with carbohydrate end of N-Acetylneuraminic acid of this protective glycoprotein forming the terminal sugar that is exposed to the contents of both the gut and the arterial lumen (opening). WGA’s unique binding specificity to these exact two glycoproteins are not be accidental. Nature has designed WGA perfectly to attach to, disrupt and gain entry through these mucosal surfaces.
It may strike some readers as highly suspect that wheat – the “staff of life” – which has garnished a reputation for “wholesome goodness” the world over, could contain a powerful health-disrupting anti-nutrient, the likes of which are only now coming to public attention. And yet, the truth is that the presence of WGA has been overshadowed by other proteins in wheat, which humans – not Nature – have spent thousands of years cultivating in order to contain larger and larger quantities. These pharmacologically active, opiate-like proteins in gluten are known as gluten exorphines (A5, B4, B5, C) and gliadorphin, and they may effectively anesthetize us, in the short term, to the long term adverse effects of WGA. Gluten also contains exceptionally high levels of the excitotoxic l-aspartic and l-glutamic amino acids, which can be highly addictive, not unlike their synthetic shadow molecules aspartame and monosodium glutamate.1 In a previous article on the topic, The Dark Side of Wheat: New Perspectives on Celiac Disease and Wheat Intolerance[2], we explored the role that these psychotropic qualities in grains played in ushering in civilization at the advent of the Neolithic transition 10,000 BC. No doubt the narcotic properties of wheat are the primary reason why suspicions about its toxicity have remained merely speculation, for thousands upon thousands of years.
WGA is most concentrated in the seed of the wheat plant, likely due to the fact that the seeds are the “babies” of these plants and are invested with the entire hope for continuance of their species. Protecting the seed against predation is necessarily a first priority. WGA is an exceedingly small glycoprotein (36 kilodaltons) and is concentrated deep within the embryo of the wheat berry (approximately 1 microgram per grain). WGA migrates during germination to the roots and tips of leaves, as the developing plant begins to project itself into the world and outside the safety of its seed. In its attempt to gain nourishment from the earth, its roots are challenged with fungi and bacteria seeking to invade, and in its attempt to receive sunlight and nourishment from the heavens, its leaves become prey to insects, birds, mammals, etc. After the plant has passed beyond the germination and sprouting stages it continues to contain almost 50% of the levels of lectin found in the dry seeds, approximately 1/3 in the roots and 2/3rds in the shoot, for at least 34 days [3]
There exists 1 microgram per wheat grain of WGA, hardly enough it would seem to do any harm to an animal of our size. Lectins, however, are notoriously dangerous even in minute doses and can be fatal when injected directly into the blood or inhaled. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control it only takes 500 micrograms (about half a grain of sand) of ricin (a lectin extracted from castor bean casings) to kill a human. A one ounce slice of wheat bread contains approximately 500 micrograms of WGA, which if it were precipitated out in its pure form and injected directly into the blood, could in theory have platelet aggregating and erythrocyte agglutinizing effects strong enough to create an obstructive clot as occurs in myocardial infarction and stroke. This, however, is not a likely route of exposure and in reality the immediate pathologies associated with lectins like ricin and WGA are largely restricted to the gastrointestinal tract where they cause mucosal injuries. The point is that WGA, even in small quantities, could have rather profound adverse effects, given suitable conditions. Ironically, it is only because WGA is exceptionally small at 36 kilodaltons (approximately the mass of 36,000 hydrogen atoms) that it can pass through the cell membranes of the intestine with ease. The intestines will allow passage of molecules up to 1,000 kilodaltons in size. Moreover, since one wheat kernel contains 16.7 trillion individual molecules of WGA, with each molecule of WGA having four N-Acetylglucosamine binding sites, the disruptive and damaging effects of whole wheat bread consumption in someone whose protective mucosal barrier has been compromised by something as simple as Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) use, or a recent viral or bacterial infection, are formidable. The common consumption of both wheat and NSAIDs represent a vicious cycle, as dependency on anti-inflammatory medications such as ibuprofen and aspirin which increase intestinal permeabilty may cause even higher than normal amounts of pro-inflammatory WGA to being absorbed. Conversely, the inflammation caused by the absorption of WGA lectin is the very reason why there is a great need for the inflammation-reducing effects of NSAIDs.
Perhaps one way to gauge how pervasive the adverse effects of WGA are in wheat consuming populations is the popularity of glucosamine as a dietary supplement. A quarter billion dollars of the stuff is sold in US annually. The main source of glucosamine on the market is from the N-Acetylglucosamine rich chitin exoskelotons of crustaceans, like shrimp and crab. The pain and inflammation reducing effects of glucosamine are obviously not due to a deficiency of the pulverized shells of dead sea critters in our diet any more than the pain and inflammation reducing effects of NSAIDs are obviously not caused by a deficiency of these synthetic chemicals in our diet. When we consume glucosamine supplements the WGA, instead of binding to our tissues, binds to the pulverized chitin in the glucosamine supplements, sparing us from the full impact of WGA. Many millions of Americans who have experienced their pain and suffering greatly reduced by the ingestion of glucosamine and NSAIDs may be better served by removing wheat, the underlying cause of their malaise, from their diet, as this would result in even greater health and far less dependency on palliative supplements and medicines alike.
In order to underscore this point further, what follows are the numerous ways in which WGA contributes to disrupting our health, and glucosamine contributes to blocking:
WGA may be Pro-inflammatory
At exceedingly small concentrations (nanomolar), WGA stimulates the synthesis of pro-inflammatory chemical messengers (cytokines) including Interleukin 1, Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 in intestinal and immune cells.[4] WGA has been shown to induce NADPH-Oxidase in human neutrophils associated with the “respiratory burst” that results in the release of inflammatory reactive oxygen species[5] WGA has been shown to play a causative role in patients with chronic thin gut inflammation.[6]
WGA may be Immunotoxic
WGA induces thymus atrophy in rats[7], and may directly bind to leukocytes and activate them.[8] Anti-WGA antibodies in human sera have shown the ability to cross react with other proteins, indicating they may contribute to autoimmunity.[9] Indeed, WGA appears to play a role in the pathogenesis of celiac disease (CD), entirely distinct from that of gluten, due to the fact that IgG and IgA antibodies to WGA are significantly higher in CD than patients with other intestinal disorders and these antibodies were shown not to cross-react with gluten antigens[10] [11]
WGA may be Neurotoxic
WGA is capable of passing through the blood brain barrier (BBB) through a process called “adsorptive endocytosis”[12] and is able to travel freely throughout the tissues of the brain which is why it is used as a marker for tracing neural circuits[13] WGA’s ability to pass through the BBB without damaging it, as well as to pull through other substances to which it is bound, has perked the interest of pharmaceutical developers looking to find ways to delivering drugs to the brain. WGA has a unique binding affinity for N-Acetylneuraminic acid, a crucial component of neuronal membranes found in the brain such as gangliosides which have diverse roles such as cell-to-cell contact, ion conductance and as receptors, and whose dysfunction have been implicated in neurodegenerative disorders. WGA may attach to the protective coating of the nerves known as the myelin sheath[14] and is capable of inhibiting nerve growth factor,[15] which is important for the growth, maintenance and survival of certain target neurons. WGA binds to N-Acetylglucosamine which is believed to function as an atypical neurotransmitter functioning in nocioceptive (pain) pathways.
WGA may be Cytotoxic
WGA has been demonstrated to be cytotoxic to both normal and cancerous cell lines, capable of inducing either cell cycle arrest or programmed cell death (apoptosis). [16]
WGA may interfere with Gene Expression
WGA demonstrates both mitogenic and anti-mitogenic[17] activities. WGA may prevent DNA replication[18] WGA binds to polysialic acid (involved in posttranslational modifications) and blocks chick tail bud development in embryogenesis, indicating that it may influence both genetic and epigenetic factors.
WGA may disrupt Endocrine Function
WGA has also been shown to have an insulin-mimetic action, potentially contributing to weight gain and insulin resistance.[19] WGA has been implicated in obesity and “leptin resistance” by blocking the receptor in the hypothalamus for the appetite satiating hormone leptin. WGA stimulates epidermal growth factor which when upregulated is associated with increased risk of cancer. WGA has a particular affinity for thyroid tissue and has been shown to bind to both benign and malignant thyroid nodules[20] WGA interferes with the production of secretin from the pancreas, which can interfere with digestion and can cause pancreatic hypertrophy. WGA attaches to sperm and ovary cells, indicating it may adversely influence fertility.
WGA may be Cardiotoxic
WGA induces platelet activation and aggregration[21] WGA has a potent, disruptive effect on platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1, which plays a key role in tissue regeneration and safely removing neutrophils from our blood vessels.[22]
WGA may adversely effect Gastrointestinal Function
WGA causes increased shedding of the intestinal brush border membrane, reduction in surface area, acceleration of cell losses and shortening of villi, via binding to the surface of the villi. WGA can mimic the effects of epidermal growth factor (EGF) at the cellular level, indicating that the crypt hyperplasia seen in celiac disease may be due to the growth-promoting effects of WGA. WGA causes cytoskeleton degradation in intestinal cells, contributing to cell death and increased turnover. WGA decreases levels of heat shock proteins in gut epithelial cells leaving these cells less well protected against the potentially harmful content of the gut lumen.[23]
WGA may share pathogenic similarities with certain Viruses
There are a number of interesting similarities between WGA lectin and viruses. Both viral particles and WGA lectin are several orders of magnitude smaller than the cells they enter, and subsequent to their attachment to the cell membrane, are taken into the cell through a process of endocytosis. Both influenza and WGA gain entry through the sialic acid coatings of our mucous membranes (glycocalyx), each with a sialic acid specific substance, the neuriminidase enzyme for viruses and the sialic acid binding sites on the WGA lectin. Once the influenza virus and WGA lectin have made their way into wider circulation in the host body they are both capable of blurring the line in the host between self-and non-self. Influenza accomplishes this by incorporating itself into the genetic material of our cells and taking over the protein production machinery to make copies of itself, with the result that our immune system must attack its own virally transformed cell, in order to clear the infection. Studies done with herpes simplex virus have shown that WGA has the capacity to block viral infectivity through competitively binding to the same cell surface receptors, indicating that they may effect cells through very similar pathways. WGA has the capability of influencing the gene expression of certain cells, e.g. mitogenic/anti-mitogenic action, and like other lectins associated with autoimmunity, e.g. soy lectin, and viruses like Epstein-Barr Virus, WGA may be capable of causing certain cells to exhibit class 2 human leukocyte antigens (HLA-II), which mark them for autoimmune destruction by white blood cells. Since human antibodies to WGA have been shown to cross react with other proteins, even if WGA does not directly transform the phenotype of our cells into “other,” the resulting cross-reactivity of antibodies to WGA with our own cells would result in autoimmunity nonetheless.
Given the multitude of ways in which WGA may disrupt our health, gain easy entry through our intestine into systemic circulation, and remain refractory to traditional antibody-based clinical diagnoses, it is altogether possible that the consumption of wheat is detracting from the general health of the wheat-consuming world and that we have been, for all these years, “digging our graves with our teeth.” This perspective may come to the great surprise of the health food industry, whose particular love affair for whole wheat products has begun to go mass market. The increasingly hyped-up marketing of ”whole wheat,” “sprouted grain,” and “wheat germ” enriched products, all of which may have considerably higher levels of WGA than their processed, fractionized, non-germinated and supposedly “less healthy” equivalents, may contribute to making us all significantly less healthy.
It is my belief that a careful study of the wheat plant will reveal that despite our projections man does not have self-proclaimed dominion over Nature, and all that he deems fit for his consumption may not be given to him for food as an inborn right. Though the wheat plant’s uniquely defenseless disposition would appear to make it a rather suitable candidate for mass human consumption, it has been designed with a multitude of invisible “thorns,” with WGA being its smallest and perhaps most potent. If WGA is an uninvited guest at our table, so too are we wheat’s uninvited guest. Perhaps the courteous thing to do, having realized our mistaken intrusion, is to lick our wounds and simply go our separate ways. Perhaps as the distance between man and his infatuation with wheat grows, he will grow closer to himself and will discover far more suitable forms of nourishment that Nature has not impregnated with such high levels of addictive and potentially debilitating proteins.
[1] Desmond S. T. Nicholl, An Introduction to Genetic Engineering, 3rd Edition ISBN-13: 9780521615211
[2] Ji, Sayer “The Dark Side of Wheat – New Perspectives on Celiac Disease & Wheat Intolerance.” Winter, 08’, Journal of Gluten Sensitivity
[3] Distribution of Wheat Germ Agglutinin in Young Wheat Plants. Plant Physiol. 1980 Nov;66(5):950-955. PMID: 16661559
[4] Effects of wheat germ agglutinin on human gastrointestinal epithelium: insights from an experimental model of immune/epithelial cell interaction. Toxicol and Applied Pharmacology 2009 Jun 1;237(2):146-53. Epub 2009 Mar 28. PMID 19332085
[5] Wheat germ agglutinin induces NADPH-oxidase activity in human neutrophils by interaction with mobilizable receptors. Infection and Immunity. 1999 Jul;67(7):3461-8. PMID 10377127
[6] Lectin glycosylation as a marker of thin gut inflammation. The FASEB Journal. 2008;22:898.3
[7] Antinutritive effects of wheat-germ agglutinin and other N-acetylglucosamine-specific lectins.The British Journal of Nutrition 1993 Jul;70(1):313-21. PMID: 8399111
[8] Lectinlike properties of pertussis toxin. . Infection and Immunity 1989 Jun;57(6):1854-7. PMID: 2722243
[9] Natural human antibodies to dietary lectins. FEBS Lett. 1996 Nov 18;397(2-3):139-42. PMID: 8955334
[10] Antibodies to wheat germ agglutinin in coeliac disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 1986 January; 63(1): 95–100. PMID: 3754186
[11] Elevated levels of serum antibodies to the lectin wheat germ agglutinin in celiac children lend support to the gluten-lectin theory of celiac disease. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1995 May;6(2):98-102. PMID: 7581728
[12] Transcytotic pathway for blood-borne protein through the blood-brain barrier. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences U S A. 1988 Jan;85(2):632-6. PMID: 2448779
[13] Transsynaptic transport of wheat germ agglutinin expressed in a subset of type II taste cells of transgenic mice. BMC Neuroscience. 2008 Oct 2;9:96. PMID: 18831764
[14] Distribution of concanavalin A and wheat germ agglutinin binding sites in the rat peripheral nerve fibres revealed by lectin/glycoprotein-gold histochemistry. The Histochem Journal. 1996 Jan;28(1):7-12. PMID: 8866643
[15] Wheat germ agglutinin, concanavalin A, and lens culinalis agglutinin block the inhibitory effect of nerve growth factor on cell-free phosphorylation of Nsp100 in PC12h cells. Cell Struct and Function 1989 Feb;14(1):87-93. PMID:2720800
[16] Wheat germ lectin induces G2/M arrest in mouse L929 fibroblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2004 Apr 15;91(6):1159-73. PMID: 15048871
[17] Wheat germ agglutinin and concanavalin A inhibit the response of human fibroblasts to peptide growth factors by a post-receptor mechanism. J Cell Physiol. 1985 Sep;124(3):474-80. PMID: 2995421
[18] DNA replication in cell-free extracts from Xenopus eggs is prevented by disrupting nuclear envelope function. J Cell Sci. 1992 Jan;101 ( Pt 1):43-53. PMID: 1569128
[19] Effects of wheat germ agglutinin and concanavalin A on the accumulation of glycosaminoglycans in pericellular matrix of human dermal fibroblasts. A comparison with insulin. Acta Biochim Pol. 2001;48(2):563-72. PMID: 11732625
[20] Analysis of lectin binding in benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1989 Feb;113(2):186-9. PMID: 2916907
[21] Further characterization of wheat germ agglutinin interaction with human platelets: exposure of fibrinogen receptors. Thromb Haemost. 1986 Dec 15;56(3):323-7. PMID: 3105108
[22] Wheat germ agglutinin-induced platelet activation via platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1: involvement of rapid phospholipase C gamma 2 activation by Src family kinases. Biochemistry. 2001 Oct 30;40(43):12992-3001. PMID: 11669637
[23] Decreased levels of heat shock proteins in gut epithelial cells after exposure to plant lectins. Gut. 2000 May;46(5):679-87. PMID: 10764712
Filed under: Featured Article | Tags: echinacea, h1n1 infection alternatives, natural alternatives h1n1, natural H1N1 remedies, swine flu alternatives, swine flu research, tamiflu resistance, vaccine alternatives
This just in from the Journal of Virology, published Nov. 2009: Echinacea combats highly pathogenic and Tamiflu-resistant strains of avian and swine-origin influenza, potentially offering the public safe, effective and inexpensive alternative to vaccination.
Echinacea extract has antiviral activity against highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1, H7N7) and swine-origin H1N1 (S-OIV).
Anti-viral properties and mode of action of standardized Echinacea purpurea extract against highly pathogenic avian Influenza virus (H5N1, H7N7) and swine-origin H1N1 (S-OIV).
Virol J. 2009 Nov 13;6(1):197. PMID:19912623
Hudson JB, Pleschka S, Schoop R, Stein M
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Influenza virus (IV) infections are a major threat to human welfare and animal health worldwide. Anti-viral therapy includes vaccines and a few anti-viral drugs. However vaccines are not always available in time, as demonstrated by the emergence of the new 2009 H1N1-type pandemic strain of swine origin (S-OIV) in April 2009, and the acquisition of resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors such as Tamiflu(R) (oseltamivir) is a potential problem. Therefore the prospects for the control of IV by existing anti-viral drugs are limited. As an alternative approach to the common anti-virals we studied in more detail a commercial standardized extract of the widely used herb Echinacea purpurea (Echinaforce(R), EF) in order to elucidate the nature of its anti-IV activity. RESULTS: Human H1N1-type IV, highly pathogenic avian IV (HPAIV) of the H5- and H7-types, as well as swine origin IV (S-OIV, H1N1), were all inactivated in cell culture assays by the EF preparation at concentrations ranging from the recommended dose for oral consumption to several orders of magnitude lower. Detailed studies with the H5N1 HPAIV strain indicated that direct contact between EF and virus was required, prior to infection, in order to obtain maximum inhibition in virus replication. Hemagglutination assays showed that the extract inhibited the receptor binding activity of the virus, suggesting that the extract interferes with the viral entry into cells. In sequential passage studies under treatment in cell culture with the H5N1 virus no EF-resistant variants emerged, in contrast to Tamiflu(R), which produced resistant viruses upon passaging. Furthermore, the Tamiflu(R)-resistant virus was just as susceptible to EF as the wild type virus. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of these investigations, we believe that this standard Echinacea preparation, used at the recommended dose for oral consumption, could be a useful, readily available and affordable addition to existing control options for IV replication and dissemination.
To View Other Relevant MEDLINE referenced biomedical citations click any of the links below
Also, don’t forget our last installation on evidence-based alternatives to vaccination for H1N1 prevention/treatment:
Elderberry flavonoids bind to and prevent H1N1 infection in vitro.
1: Phytochemistry. 2009 Aug 12. PMID: 19682714
A ionization technique in mass spectrometry called Direct Analysis in Real Time Mass Spectrometry (DART TOF-MS) coupled with a Direct Binding Assay was used to identify and characterize anti-viral components of an elderberry fruit (Sambucus nigra L.) extract without either derivatization or separation by standard chromatographic techniques. The elderberry extract inhibited Human Influenza A (H1N1) infection in vitro with an IC(50) value of 252+/-34mug/mL. The Direct Binding Assay established that flavonoids from the elderberry extract bind to H1N1 virions and, when bound, block the ability of the viruses to infect host cells. Two compounds were identified, 5,7,3′,4′-tetra-O-methylquercetin (1) and 5,7-dihydroxy-4-oxo-2-(3,4,5-trihydroxyphenyl)chroman-3-yl-3,4,5-trihydroxycyclohexanecarboxylate (2), as H1N1-bound chemical species. Compound 1 and dihydromyricetin (3), the corresponding 3-hydroxyflavonone of 2, were synthesized and shown to inhibit H1N1 infection in vitro by binding to H1N1 virions, blocking host cell entry and/or recognition. Compound 1 gave an IC(50) of 0.13mug/mL (0.36muM) for H1N1 infection inhibition, while dihydromyricetin (3) achieved an IC(50) of 2.8mug/mL (8.7muM). The H1N1 inhibition activities of the elderberry flavonoids compare favorably to the known anti-influenza activities of Oseltamivir (Tamiflu((R)); 0.32muM) and Amantadine (27muM).
Unless we put medical freedom into the Constitution the time will come when medicine will organize itself into an undercover dictatorship. To restrict the art of healing to doctors and deny equal privileges to others will constitute the Bastille of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic
- Dr. Benjamin Rush
Signer of the Declaration of Independence
Dr. Benjamin Rush accurately foretold a grave possibility facing Americans today, namely, that the art and science of healing be restricted to a select class of allopathic physicians, who have the sole legal right to recommend and administer medicines, and whose pharmacopeia excludes – as a matter of principle – all the healing foods, vitamins and herbs which have been used safely and effectively for countless millennia in the prevention and treatment of disease.
We have entered an era where medicine no longer bears any resemblance to the art and science of healing. The doctor no longer facilitates the body’s innate self-healing capabilities with time, care, good nutrition and special help from our plant allies. To the contrary, medicine has transmogrified into a business enterprise founded on the principles of pure, unbridled capitalism. Diseases are created and rolled out like new markets, each representing a veritable gold mine of symptoms, and each disease symptom providing the justification for the prescription of a new toxic drug-commodity. Healing has not simply been forgotten but intentionally exorcised as it represents the antithesis of perpetual profitability which requires the incurability of the human body. Were the truth be told, and the body’s self-regenerative capabilities acknowledged, the entire superstructure of drug-based medicine and hundreds of billions of dollars in revenue it generates annually, would crumble overnight. When a handful of turmeric has more chemotherapeutic activity than any drug yet to receive FDA approval, one begins to understand why the hundreds of studies proving that turmeric kills cancer are never discussed. You can not compete with free, effective and safe in a medical marketplace dominated by expensive, ineffective and unsafe nostrums.
If this degeneration into quackery and snake-oil salesmanship which is modern pharmaceutical-driven medicine were simply a lesson in what bad things can happen when Health Care is no longer a basic human right but strictly a profit-driven commodity, perhaps Americans could find it within themselves to once again free themselves from the shackles of oppression. After all, do many of not consider ourselves the very originators of freedom, independence and democracy? Have we not such great faith in these principles that we practically trip all over ourselves in our Promethean effort to export these values overseas whether we are invited to do so or not? Would we stand for less, when it comes to our own health freedom?
Sadly, the “undercover dictatorship” Benjamin Rush foretold is not simply a homegrown one we can root out from the inside, as it were. Although the American Medical Association (AMA) and the Food & Drug Administration (FDA) behave as if they are at the top of this pyramid of secret power relations, they only represent the tip of the iceberg. The United States government and American corporate lobbying groups may appear to be behind the FDA’s shameless pandering to the interests of the drug companies, when in fact it is transnational corporations and organizations that are actually pulling the strings. The United States no longer enjoys global economic and cultural hegemony. We are now embedded in an international playing field where multinational and transnational organizations like the chemical company Imperial Chemical Industries which owns Zeneca and which we exposed as the originator of Breast Cancer Awareness Month in our last newsletter, or the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have power and influence that overshadows the US or any other particular government or nation-state. These larger organizations blur the divisions traditionally drawn between public and private institutions, insofar as their agendas and mandates are consistent with global economic imperatives which do not account for the self-proclaimed sovereignty of any particular nation-state’s constitution or laws above its own. For example, the United States may soon no longer be able to allow the over-the-counter sale of dietary supplements if the World Trade Organization decides it violates our membership agreement to do so. (This process known as Codex Alimentarius is already far enough along, that prescription-only-vitamins are already making it onto the market and herbs like ephedra have been classified as illegal drugs).
Given this unseemly state of affairs some believe we are on the precipice of “Pharmageddon” where medicine produces more ill health than health and where medical progress does more harm than good. This process has also been described by Dr. Rima Laibow as “Nutricide”:
Nutricide (noo trih side):
1. Intentionally bringing about our causing the death of a body of knowledge and information concerning the health promoting and curative attributes of herbs, food and food components
2. Intentionally bringing about our causing the death of large numbers of people through nutritional manipulation*
(Watch Dr. Rima Laibow’s Nutricide video and learn more and take action on her website: http://www.healthfreedomusa.org)
After all, is there any greater absurdity than a medical model that treats the symptoms of disease with sub-lethal dosages of toxic chemicals and in which there is no attempt to uncover, understand or remove the causes of those imbalances?
After all, what disease has ever been found to be caused by a lack of a drug?
Is acid reflux caused by a lack of proton-pump inhibitors?
Is heart disease caused by a lack of statin drugs?
Is osteoporosis caused by a lack of Fosamax? Is cancer caused by a lack of chemotherapy?
Is depression caused by a lack of Paxil?
Absolutely not! Then why would anyone consider it sound practice to use potentially toxic chemicals as a first line treatment for conditions that are not caused by a lack of a chemical? To the contrary many diseases are caused exactly by culuminative exposure to toxic chemicals that not unlike drugs are biologically alien to the body. i.e we are treating poisoning with poisons!
Can we dignify this approach by calling it medicine? Or, is it more accurately described as a form of sorcery? The sole reliance on Pharmaceuticals reveals quite a lot about the agenda underpinning modern medical practice. The Greek word Pharmakon has the following meanings: ”drug, poison, potion, charm, spell, enchantment,” and indeed, pharmaceutical-driven medicine serves the Pharmaceutical Industry’s ultimate agenda: throw as many expensive pills as possible at the problem to make as much profit as is possible. (if you can do this while generating the illusion that you are actually “treating” disease with poisonous potions, you have succeeded in casting the right spell).
In Benjamin Rush’s time the medical dictatorship of which he spoke had not yet come to pass, and though magical potions like mercury and questionable techniques like bloodletting were used in colonial times, herbs were still considered and employed as legitimate medicines. Even if many wise women herbalists were eliminated as competition by being branded witches and disposed of (i.e. murdered), the herbs themselves were not categorically demonized because no vast armory of pharmaceutical drugs had yet been created to supplant them.
The herbs and foods themselves have now been both vilified as dangerous and lampooned as completely ineffectual, generating the ridiculous contradiction that we are supposed to be dumb enough to accept as truth: namely, that they are both impotent and unsafe. Given these circumstances confidence in the safety and efficacy of natural substances in the prevention and treatment of disease has not only waned, but the positive association between food and healing has been outright denied by medical authorities. It is illegal for non-doctors to make health claims for natural substances even if thousands of years of use in folk medicine and a vast emerging body of scientific research now confirms their benefits. You can not say cherries cure gout even if its true. (truth is no longer the criteria that decides what you can or cannot say; rather, its who profits more from the information being freely disseminated or censored).
There are a number of websites out there which provide free and convenient access to the massive amounts of research that have accumulated on the health benefits of natural substances over the past 50 years. The government database known as Medline (which can be searched without special permissions or charge) contains over 19 million biomedical citations from over 5,000 scientific journals, many of which focus specifically on the therapeutic action of foods, vitamins and spices on serious, even life-threatening disease.
I believe that it is only through the free, uncensored and democratic dissemination of health information that we can secure our health freedom and through speaking truth to power, expose the fraud which is strictly profit-driven pharmaceutical-based medicine.
“The doctor of the future will give no medicine, but will interest her or his patients in the care of the human frame, in a proper diet, and in the cause and prevention of disease.”
*Definition #2 may strike some readers as paranoia or pure madness, but consider the fact that Gary Null, PHD recently estimated that 786,000 Americans die annually from iatrogenic or medically caused deaths.
Filed under: Featured Article, Featured Research | Tags: antitubercular drugs, cardiovascular disease statin, cholesterol drug alternatives, cholesterol fights infection, cholesterol is good, lowering cholesterol, red yeast rice, statin alternatives, the cholesterol myth, tuberculosis
Recently a client of mine asked me to do research for them on alternatives to the chemotherapeutic/antitubercular drugs commonly prescribed for “latent tuberculosis,” a condition without symptoms that is believed to be best treated “prophylactically” with drugs like isoniazid even though treatment can cause lasting liver damage and only 10% of those who test positive will go on to develop full blown tubercular infection sometime later in life. “Preventive” medicine in this instance amounts to blasting the body with poisons now for fear that doing so later when infection is actually active may not work as well. Hmmm…. I’m sorry but this is a form of medical madness masquerading around as a “gold standard” treatment.
In the process of finding some natural substances which attenuate the antitubercular drug induced toxicity and/or provide natural antimicrobial alternatives, I ran across a study showing that the consumption of cholesterol has therapeutic effects in the fight against mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: A cholesterol-rich diet accelerates bacteriologic sterilization in pulmonary tuberculosis.
This was not the first time I had come across information proving that cholesterol (more specifically low density lipoprotein, the supposed “bad guy” of blood lipids) fights infection. In fact, several years ago I wrote the following article, which is worth reprinting as it still rings true today:
“We have one and a half million heart attacks in the U.S.each year. About 50 percent have normal cholesterol. Clearly, current guidelines are not adequate to identify all those individuals who are at increased risk,”
~ Nader Rifai, MD(2004)
Yes, you heard Dr. Rifai right: statistically speaking cholesterol levels have what amounts to ZERO relevance in determining heart attack risk. A 50-50 chance, after all,means a coin flips worth of certainty.
But that’s not all: people with the highest cholesterol may also live the longest…
Consider the finding of Dr. Harlan Krumholz of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at Yale University, who reported in 1994 that elderly with low cholesterol died twice as often from a heart attack as did the elderly with a high cholesterol. His research also showed that all-cause mortality was significantly reduced in those whose cholesterol was highest.
Cholesterol has long been blamed for the epidemic of heart disease in this country, despite hundreds of peer reviewed studies indicating that – to the contrary – low cholesterol levels may increase the risk of dying from infection, stroke, cancer, and yes, even heart attack itself. The fact that you and I have not heard this information in the mass media, has everything to do with who owns and/or advertises within these traditional news channels, and absolutely nothing to do with the facts: namely, cholesterol does not cause heart disease. As heretical as this sounds vis-a-vis orthodox medical opinion, entire organizations exist – international in membership – composed of concerned scientists and physicians whose sole purpose is to debunk the inherent absurdities and inaccuracies of the “lipid hypothesis,” or if you will: the “cholesterol myth.” For more elaborate information please visit the website of the International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics
Cholesterol does not cause heart disease? How can this be?
Let’s begin by acknowledging that cholesterol is an essential substance produced by nearly every cell of our body, and the building block for innumerable cellular components, such as the cell wall, bile salts, vitamin d, steroid hormones, the mylein sheath of the nerves, 30% of our brain tissue, etc. Low-density-lipoprotein or so-called “bad cholesterol,” is the delivery molecule for fat soluble antioxidants like carotenoids, vitamin E, coenzyme q10, etc. and therefore is essential for protecting the body from oxidative damage. Indeed, inadequate levels of LDL can translate into greater oxidative damage to the endothelial lining of the artery therefore increasing the risk of developing heart disease. Moreover, this much villified LDL has also been shown to rapidly deactivate bacterial endotoxin and Staphylococcus aureus a-toxin, both of which are responsible for tens of thousands of deaths from infection, annually.
Given these facts, can cholesterol really be considered all that bad?
Heart disease, after all, is a complex process involving numerous associations: high C-reactive protein, homocysteine, blood calcium, fibrin, the presence of infectious organisms (bacterial and viral), high blood sugar (and resulting glycation), etc. The biological cascade of adverse changes to the artery begins with damage to the inner lining of the artery (endothelium), resulting in endothelial dysfunction. These initial lesions can occur through any number of trespasses. Some are obvious such smoking, and some are not, such as consuming homogenized milk rich in xanthine oxidase, or through hypercalcemia caused by the ingestion of too much supplemental calcium or excessively high doses of vitamin D. Other lesser known factors include “leaky gut syndrome,” where bacteria and cardiotoxic peptides (cow’s dairy contains the cardiotoxic beta casein A1 protein) can enter the blood stream causing infection and inflammation in the arteries. Nutritional deficiencies play an essential role. Vitamin C, for instance, is necessary to produce collagen to strengthen and in the case of injury, heal the artery. B vitamins, such as folic acid, b6 and b12 are essential in lowering artery scarring homocysteine levels in the blood. Insufficient levels of vitamin E can lead to the oxidation of LDL, which in turn renders inherently beneficial cholesterol artherogenic. Insufficient levels of amino acids, like arginine, prevent the arteries from dilating sufficiently, leading to higher blood pressure. The list of simple, preventable nutritional steps goes on and on.
So, why have we been so fixated on cholesterol as the enemy for all these years?
The answer to that question has to do with the sad fact that modern medical practice is driven primarily by economic and not scientific principles. If the complex set of causes of heart disease – all of which have everything to do with what we do and do not put into our bodies – are ignored, and one “genetically predetermined” “bad guy” can be blamed for the problem, not only do you perpetuate the conditions that make the market for such drugs profitable, namely, the continuation of heart disease, but you justify the prescription of a very profitable, though entirely ineffectual drug-based solution, e.g. statin drugs.
Statin drugs are bound to become the object of the next biggest class action lawsuits due to the way in which they artificially drive down cholesterol in a manner that may compromise cardiovascular health. Even if statin drugs did not drain the heart muscle of one of its most vital nutrients: coq10, the multitude of adverse “side effects” they cause, such as cognitive impairment, muscle fatigue and muscle wasting syndrome, liver damage, increased cancer risk, neuropathy, dizziness, erectile dysfunction and depression, make it clear that they are best to be avoided as dangerous to one’s health.
We know that statin drugs inhibit the mevalonate pathway in the liver which interferes with the production of three vitally important substances: cholesterol, coenzyme q10 and dolichol. Far from being selective, taking a statin drug is like throwing a monkey wrench into the molecular machinery of one of our body’s most important vital organs: the liver. Coenzyme q10, for instance, is responsible as a co-factor for 90% of all our body’s energy production. The heart muscle, in particular, depends heavily on the presence of this essential nutrient. When levels are low, it can not perform its functions efficiently leading perhaps to elevated blood pressure, or worse, cardiomyopathy: the degeneration of the heart muscle itself. Dolichol is essential for neuropeptide formation, cell communication, cell identification, immune system functions and the cellular integrity of our body’s DNA. One analogy used to describe the effect that statins have on in the liver is like that of a virus randomly scrambling the code in our computer’s operating system. This may explain the results of the “CARE” study on statin drugs and the risk of developing breast cancer [Sacks FM and others. N EngJ Med1996;385;1001-1009]. The pravastatin treated group showed a dramatic 1500% increase in the chance of developing breast cancer! (Note: The carcinogenicity of statins was already well established in rodent studies before gaining FDA approval.)
Ultimately heart disease – or any disease! – is not caused by a LACK of a Drug.
…therefore, why are we treating heart disease with drugs? If endothelial dysfunction and plaque build up in the artery can be halted in its progression through dietary modification, or through safe and effective nutritional therapies like pomegranate juice concentrate, or lysine/proline/vitamin c, why are we simply masking symptoms and driving the underlying disease deeper into the system with toximolecular drugs? It comes down to our choices, and our desire to attain greater education and self-awareness. Last time I checked self-healing still does not require FDA approval, so let’s get to it!
for more information visit the:
The International Network of Cholesterol Skeptics
Sayer Ji is writer, researcher and nutrition educator. Visit his website http://www.greenmedinfo.com for strictly scientific information on the therapeutic value of natural substances.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Sayer_Ji
GreenMedInfo.com – Evidence-Based Natural Substances for Lowering Cholesterol:
Filed under: Featured Article, Featured Research | Tags: breast cancer awareness month, breast cancer controversy, breast cancer industry, dark side of breast cancer awareness month, mammography issues
AstraZeneca, manufacturer of the blockbuster breast cancer drugs Arimidex and Tamoxifen, founded the National Breast Cancer Awareness Month in 1985 in order to promote the widespread adoption of x-ray mammography.
Sadly, Breast Cancer Awareness Month is a time of increasing awareness not of the preventable causes of breast cancer, but of the breast cancer industry’s insatiable need to both raise money for research into a pharmaceutical cure, and to promote its primary means of “prevention”: early detection via x-ray mammography.
On first account, a pharmaceutical “cure” is as unlikely as it is oxymoronic. Drugs do not cure disease anymore than bullets cure war. Beneath modern medicine’s showy display of diagnostic contraptions, heroic “life-saving” procedures, and an armory of exotic drugs of strange origin and power, it is always the body’s ability to heal itself – beneath the pomp and circumstance – that is truly responsible for medicine’s apparent successes. Too often, in spite of what medicine does to “treat” or “save” the body, it is the body which against invasive chemical and surgical medical interventions, silently treats and saves itself.
If it were not for the body’s truly miraculous self-healing abilities, and the ceaseless self-correction process that occurs each and every moment within each and every cell, our bodies would perish within a matter of minutes. The mystery is not in how our body succumbs to cancer; rather the mystery is in how, after years and even decades of chemical exposure and nutrient deprivation our bodies prevail against cancer for so long.
The primary causes of breast cancer: nutritional deficiencies, exposure to environmental toxicity, inflammation, estrogen dominance and the resultant breakdown in genetic integrity and immune surveillance, are entirely overlooked by this fixation on drug therapy and its would-be “magic bullets.”
Billions of dollars are raised and funneled towards drug research, when the lowly turmeric plant, the humble cabbage and the unassuming bowl of miso soup may offer far more promise in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer than all the toximolecular drugs on the market put together. (To view several dozen substances go to GreenMedinfo: Breast Cancer)
When it comes to the breast cancer industry’s emphasis on equating “prevention” with “early detection” through x-ray mammography, nowhere is the inherently pathological ideology of allopathic medicine more clearly evident. Not only is the very ionizing radiation used to discern pathological lesions in breast tissue one of the very risk factors for the development of breast cancer, but the identification of the word “prevention” with “early detection,” is a disingenuous way of saying that all we can do to prevent breast cancer is to detect its inevitable presence sooner than would be possible without this technology.
If women succumb to the idea of prevention as doing nothing but waiting for the detection of the disease, many will find a similarly deranged logic reemerge later when the self-fulfilling prophecy of prevention-through-doing-nothing is fulfilled and “treatment” is now required. “Treatment,” when not strictly surgical, involves the use of very powerful chemicals and high doses of ionizing radiation which “poison” the cancer cells. The obvious problem with this approach is that the application of either form of death energy is not suitably selective, and in the long run, many women die sooner from the side effects of toximolecular “therapy” than from the cancer itself. Why is the obvious question never asked: if exposure to the genotoxic and immune system disabling effects of chemicals and radiation is causative in breast cancer, then why is blasting the body with more poisonous chemicals and radiation considered sound treatment? The answer to this question has much more to do with ignorance than it does an intentional desire to do harm. But the results are the same: unnecessary pain, suffering and death.
Faced with a situation where medieval notions of prevention and treatment of breast cancer are the norm, it is no wonder that when polled over 40% of women believe they will contract breast cancer sometime in their life – well over three times their actual risk. After all, have any of them been given a sense that there is something they can do to actually prevent their disease other than “watchful waiting”?
Obfuscating the real preventative measures available to women to combat breast cancer, and all cancers for that matter, trusted “authoritative” sources like the Susan G. Komen Foundation publish irresponsible statements like this:
“It is unclear what the exact relationship is between eating fruits and vegetables and breast cancer risk…little, if any link was found between the two in a pooled analysis that combined data from eight large studies.”
Have we really come to the point where the commonsense consumption of fruits and vegetables in the prevention of disease can so matter-of-factly be called into question? Do we really need randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled clinical trials to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that our bodies can benefit from the phytonutrients and antioxidants in fruits and vegetables in the prevention of cancer?
Another atrocious example of this conspiracy against identifying the obvious causes and cures for diseases like breast cancer is the National Breast Cancer Foundation’s website. Go to the bottom of their homepage and type in “carcinogen” in their site wide search box. This is what will appear on the results page:
“Your search – carcinogen – did not match any documents. No pages were found containing “carcinogen”. “
On Susan G. Komen’s website the term only emerges twice, and both in the context of denying the likliehood of there being a connection between smoking and breast cancer.
If you can remove the reality of carcinogenicity by erasing from the mind’s of would-be cancer sufferers the word carcinogen, and thereby conceal the link between environmental and dietary exposures of a multitude of toxins, then the obvious “cure” these massive organizations are vacuuming in billions of dollars of donations every year to find, namely, the removal of carcinogens and detoxification of the system, will never be discovered.
Examples like these make it increasingly apparent that orthodox medicine, and the world view it represents, is approaching a theoretical end-time perhaps most accurately described as Pharmageddon. Within the horizon of this perspective vitamins are considered toxic, fruits and vegetables simply a source of caloric content (a poor one, at that), and cancer-causing drugs are understood as the only legitimate and for that matter, legal, way to combat cancer. Are we really at the tipping point, or is there still hope?
Fortunately there are thousands of scientific studies extant today on the therapeutic value of foods, herbs and spices in breast health, many of which can be found on the government’s own biomedical database known as MEDLINE. Decades of research have confirmed the veracity of the Hippocratic phrase: “Let food be thy medicine,” and until a prescription is required to obtain and consume organic food, we can still draw from a vast cornucopia of natural substances whose safety and efficacy that the conventional pharmacopeia to shame.
RELATED LINKS
1) GreenMedInfo.com: Natural Aromatase Inhibitors
2) GreenMedInfo.com: Natural Anti-Breast Cancer Substances
3) GreenMedInfo.com: Proof that making the bone dense can profoundly increase breast cancer risk.
4) Dr. Mercola: Why Mammography is NOT an Effective Breast Cancer Screen
Filed under: Featured Article
The more one learns about Turmeric (Curcuma longa) the more astounded one becomes by its extremely wide range of therapeutic properties. On my free online health datatabase www.GreenMedinfo.com I have posted over 100 studies culled from MEDLINE on Turmeric’s value in the treatment of diseases ranging from Alzheimers to Epstein-Barr, Cystic Fibrosis to Aortic Aneurysm.
Although Turmeric is considered “generally accepted as safe” (GRAS) by the FDA and is both the most ancient (5,000 years of recorded usage) and promising (100’s of test tube and animal studies) chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agent on the planet, most oncologists will not employ it as part of a cancer treatment protocol because it is has not received FDA approval as a “cancer drug.” In order to fully understand the implications of this restriction it is necessary to understand the FDA’s definition of a medicine or “drug.”
According to the FDA’s legal definition anything that “diagnoses, cures, mitigates, treats, or prevents a disease” is defined as a drug. The problem with this definition is that there are numerous substances, as readily available and benign as found on our spice racks, which have been proven to mitigate, prevent and in some cases CURE disease, and which CAN NOT be called DRUGS according to the FDA. How can this be? Well, the FDA has Godlike power insofar as it has to grant a healing substance its official approval for it to be considered to have legitimate application in the treatment of disease. This is also a rather Napoleonic agency insofar as what it does not explicitly permit as being therapeutic is by implication not permitted and officially considered not therapeutic (cf. Napoleonic law).
Moreover, historically the FDA has required very expensive clinical studies (approximately $50 million per drug) which are out of the grasp of any interest who might want to demonstrate the efficacy of a non-patentable and therefore unprofitable herb, food or spice.
If Hippocrates, the founder of modern medicine, were alive today, he would be forced to qualify himself by saying: “Seek FDA approval for permission to let food be thy medicine.
Again, the common kitchen spice Turmeric is a perfect example of this extraordinary hypocrisy. Although one can find over 200 biomedical citations on PubMed (pubmed.gov) discussing Turmeric’s ability to cause apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, it has not received the FDA’s approval as a drug in the treatment of cancer. With over a million cases of cancer diagnosed annually in America, would it not be sensible for the FDA to approve the use of a substance with such extraordinary scientific backing and consensus on its effectiveness AND safety? And if not as a primary chemotherapeutic treatment, than at the very least as an adjuvant therapy? Sadly, the likely reason this miraculous substance has not been made available to cancer sufferers today is because it can be grown in one’s back yard for free! *
Here we have the fundamental point. The FDA’s definition of a drug is not descriptive, but is a persuasive definition which purports to describe the “true” or “commonly accepted” meaning of a term, while in reality stipulating a meaning that serves only the interests of the drug companies it so spinelessly serves. If an herb can not be converted into a proprietary, profitable, patentable commodity, it will forever be barred from attaining the legitimacy of a “drug,” no matter how effective it is at treating disease. When drug companies do manage to produce an extract of a whole herb, they almost invariably make the same fatal error: they equate the healing force of the whole plant with only certain decomposed isolates or ‘mono-chemicals’ found within this living, infinitely complex totality. Even worse, they tinker with these isolates to ensure that they are unique enough to derive a patent, with the unfortunate outcome that the new chemical analogue is now biologically unprecedented. This folly results in profound side effects and toxicity, and serves only one objective: to ensure the 20 year market exclusivity that a FDA awarded patent affords. One can play God by isolating and reproducing facsimiles of a component of a complex living organism such as Turmeric.
But the isolate will never compare to the safety and healing power of the whole herb, produced by Mother Nature Herself; rather, it is more likely to behave like Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, with uncontrollable and violent side effects.
And this is another key point: Mother Nature does not grant patents, even though her formulas are proprietary. She will never lend herself to rampant profit making and outlandish claims, nor will she make the mechanism of her healing perfectly intelligible vis-à-vis the scientific method. It is commodity and profit driven medicine, with its underlying emphasis on perverting the scientific method to serve economic objectives that concerns itself with patent exclusivities, hyperbolic claims and profit as an end unto itself. Rather than lament this fact, I have decided to celebrate it. If whole food supplements, herbs and vitamins are forever exiled from the would-be legitimacy of the allopathic pharmacopoeia, then so be it! This can not obviate the healing gifts that issue prolifically and freely from the Lap of Nature herself; nor does it negate that birthright of health which we all participate in, knowingly and unknowingly. Rather, this exclusion of what works and is right, and good, from the compass and concern of orthodox medical principle and practice, is an indication of a complete failure in credibility of the allopathic system as a whole, and which has earned it its disgraceful nickname: the Disestablishment. Until food is allowed to be considered medicine once again, orthodox medical can not rightly claim to be interested in healing disease. Thomas Edison left us with a sage premonition of a possible future that may still remain within our grasp, when he wrote:
“The doctor of the future will give no medicine but will interest his patients in the care of the human frame, in diet, and in the cause and prevention of human disease.”
* Zevalin is a chemotherapeutic agent which costs $24,000 a month for treatment of various forms of B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, e.g. follicular lymphoma. The study below demonstrates that curcumin (the ethanol soluble fraction of Turmeric) induces programmed cell death in follicular cancer cells. Should this substance not be fast-tracked for testing in human clinical trials? Of course, however, what type of return-on-investment can be expected when a 50 million dollar trial is performed to prove the efficacy and potential superiority of this natural substance vis-a-vis proprietary money-makers like Zevalin when Turmeric can be produced for free from the Lap of Mother Nature?
-
Cellular foundation of curcumin-induced apoptosis in follicular lymphoma cell lines.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, University of Kuopio, Finland. joannaskommer@yahoo.com
OBJECTIVE: Although responsive to first-line treatments, follicular lymphoma (FL) remains a fatal disease of increasing worldwide incidence. In efforts to find novel approaches to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in FL cells, we examined the action of naturally occurring compound curcumin in the three recently established FL cell lines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytotoxic effects and determination of apoptotic attributes upon curcumin treatment were analyzed using growth inhibition, [(3)H]-thymidine, fluorescence microscopy, and flow cytometry assays, as well as Western blotting. Chemical inhibitor studies for the assessment of caspase and cathepsin contribution were applied. Expression of 10 members of the bcl-2 family proteins was evaluated by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Curcumin inhibited proliferation and growth, and induced profound apoptosis associated with a shift in the balance of the bcl-2 family proteins, in all cell lines tested. Strikingly, we observed that curcumin-induced caspase-dependent apoptosis is also associated with lysosomal rupture (LMP). An increase in intracellular ROS generation appeared critical for curcumin-evoked LMP, loss of Deltapsi(m,) caspase activation, and cell death, as well as ascorbic acid-mediated enhancement of curcumin’s action. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated for the first time that curcumin is an efficient inducer of apoptosis in FL cell lines, meriting its further evaluation in vivo.
PMID: 16569593 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
On Sept. 21st it was announced on Reuters that shares of VeriChip Corp’s (CHIP.O) stock tripled after the company received FDA approval for two patents on its human-implantable H1N1 virus sensing chip technology.
If this concept of implanting chips into the body seems novel to you consider that Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology has been used in night clubs in Spain and the Netherlands since 2004 to identify VIP customers, who in turn use it to pay for drinks. More frightening is the FDA’s tacit support of a number of US hospitals actively implanting patients with RFID tags and using RFID systems to ramp up surveillance of both staff and patient behavior.
According to Wikipedia, as of October 2004:
“…the FDA approved USA’s first RFID chips that can be implanted in humans. The 134 kHz RFID chips, from VeriChip Corp. can incorporate personal medical information and could save lives and limit injuries from errors in medical treatments, according to the company. The FDA approval was disclosed during a conference call with investors. Shortly after the approval, authors and anti-RFID activists Katherine Albrecht and Liz McIntyre discovered a warning letter from the FDA that spelled out serious health risks associated with the VeriChip. According to the FDA, these include “adverse tissue reaction”, “migration of the implanted transponder”, “failure of implanted transponder”, “electrical hazards” and “magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] incompatibility.”
The RFID devices bring to light an increasingly alarming situation in this country and abroad: the seamless integration of the Medical and Military industrial establishments. One will no longer “become sick” without also undergoing military-style “surveillance,” and being classified as a “security threat.”
Indeed, with the Military Comissions Act of 2006 lifting the restrictions placed on the military to support and/or oversee civilian law enforcement (i.e. Posse Comitatus Act) as embodied so clearly in the 3rd Infantry Division’s 1st Brigade Combat Team being assigned to U.S. Northern Command on Oct. 1st, 2008, the writing is on the wall: Who-defined “pandemic” viruses such as the rather obviously benign* H1N1 strain are being used to justify the implementation of martial law in this country. If you are not familiar with REX 84 you will not realize that what is happening today, e.g. disregard of “informed consent” and/or coerced or mandatory vaccination, has been in the works for a quarter of a century.
Our national sovereignty vis-a-vis the looming UN, WHO, IMF, WTO articulated “One World Government,” or “New World Order,” does not stand a chance if we continue to allow ourselves to be brainwashed and intimidated into subjecting ourselves and our children to medically-mediated violence.
Please visit Jane Burgermeister’s website, “The Flu Case,” to learn about what is being done to fight off this juggernaut: http://www.theflucase.com/
Learn more at:
http://www.pandemicfluonline.com/
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/
Related Articles:
Feds approve human RFID implants
I’ve been spending long weekends glued to the LCD fishing for clinical pearls, as it were for the GreenMedInfo.com project. My eyes have been getting a bit fried over the past year, so I’ve been crossing my fingers to find a study which demonstrates that a natural substance can reduce the adverse effects of the light coming off of a computer monitor on the retina. I’m happy to say I have found one:
Lutein supplementation improves visual function in people exposed to long-term computer display light exposure.
A 12-week lutein supplementation improves visual function in Chinese people with long-term computer display light exposure.
1: Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;102(2):186-90. PMID: 19586568
We aimed to examine the effect of different doses of lutein supplementation on visual function in subjects with long-term computer display light exposure. Thirty-seven healthy subjects with long-term computer display light exposure ranging in age from 22 to 30 years were randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group L6 (6 mg lutein/d, n 12); Group L12 (12 mg lutein/d, n 13); and Group Placebo (maltodextrin placebo, n 12). Levels of serum lutein and visual performance indices such as visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity were measured at weeks 0 and 12. After 12-week lutein supplementation, serum lutein concentrations of Groups L6 and L12 increased from 0.356 (SD 0.117) to 0.607 (SD 0.176) micromol/l, and from 0.328 (SD 0.120) to 0.733 (SD 0.354) micromol/l, respectively. No statistical changes from baseline were observed in uncorrected visual acuity and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity, whereas there was a trend toward increase in visual acuity in Group L12. Contrast sensitivity in Groups L6 and L12 increased with supplementation, and statistical significance was reached at most visual angles of Group L12. No significant change was observed in glare sensitivity over time. Visual function in healthy subjects who received the lutein supplement improved, especially in contrast sensitivity, suggesting that a higher intake of lutein may have beneficial effects on the visual performance.
Related Articles: Attenuating Cell-Phone Induced Damage with Natural Substances.










